pennsylvania: have low risk of earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.59
, new england
Weight: 0.57
Siblings west virginia
Weight: 0.76
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.63
, indiana
Weight: 0.60
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have low risk of earthquakes 1.00
be in danger of catastrophic hurricane 0.78
be vulnerable to hurricanes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(new york city, be vulnerable to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(new york city, be in danger of catastrophic hurricane)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(new york city, be in danger of catastrophic hurricane)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(new york city, be vulnerable to hurricanes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be in danger of catastrophic hurricane)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be vulnerable to hurricanes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(new york city, be vulnerable to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(new york city, be in danger of catastrophic hurricane)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be in danger of catastrophic hurricane)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(new york city, be vulnerable to hurricanes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be in danger of catastrophic hurricane)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(pennsylvania, have low risk of earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(new york city, be vulnerable to hurricanes)