pennsylvania: is best state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.59
, new england
Weight: 0.57
Siblings west virginia
Weight: 0.76
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.63
, indiana
Weight: 0.60
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best state 1.00
has state state 0.80
have best colleges 0.79
was 33rd state 0.78
was state 0.78
is most miserable state 0.77
is poor state 0.77
be called state 0.77
was important to new nation 0.77
is greatest commercial city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(new york city, is greatest commercial city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(wisconsin, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(new york city, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york city, was important to new nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york city, was important to new nation)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(new york city, is greatest commercial city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is greatest commercial city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was important to new nation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, have best colleges)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be called state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(wisconsin, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(new york city, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(new york city, is greatest commercial city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york city, was important to new nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(connecticut, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(indiana, is best state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(west virginia, is most miserable state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(connecticut, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be called state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(massachusetts, have best colleges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, have best colleges)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, is best state)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was 33rd state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was 33rd state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was 33rd state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was 33rd state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new york city, was important to new nation)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has state state)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(new york city, is greatest commercial city)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(connecticut, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(massachusetts, have best colleges)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new york city, was important to new nation)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has state state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(new york city, is greatest commercial city)