pennsylvania: was settled

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.59
, new england
Weight: 0.57
Siblings west virginia
Weight: 0.76
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.63
, indiana
Weight: 0.60
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was settled 1.00
was first settled 0.97
was settled peacefully or 0.80
was settlement 0.78
was better suited for settlement 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was settled)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was settled)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(new england, was settled)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was settled)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(new england, was settled)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was settled)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was settled)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was settled)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was settled)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was settlement)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was better suited for settlement)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was settled)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(new england, was settled)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(connecticut, was settled)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was settled)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(connecticut, was settlement)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was settlement)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(massachusetts, was better suited for settlement)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was better suited for settlement)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was settled)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was first settled)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was first settled)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was settled peacefully or)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled peacefully or)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was first settled)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was settled peacefully or)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled peacefully or)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was first settled)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was settled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was settled)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new england, was settled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(connecticut, was settled)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(connecticut, was settlement)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was better suited for settlement)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was settled)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new england, was settled)