peony: is edible

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flower
Weight: 0.69
, bloom
Weight: 0.52
, word
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, pink
Weight: 0.47
Siblings hydrangea
Weight: 0.38
, chrysanthemum
Weight: 0.38
, tulip
Weight: 0.38
, lily
Weight: 0.37
, aster
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is edible 1.00
is edible arrangements 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tulip, is edible arrangements)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tulip, is edible)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(tulip, is edible)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(tulip, is edible)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(tulip, is edible arrangements)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(tulip, is edible arrangements)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(peony, is edible)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(peony, is edible arrangements)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(peony, is edible arrangements)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(peony, is edible arrangements)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(peony, is edible arrangements)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peony, is edible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(peony, is edible)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(tulip, is edible)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peony, is edible)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tulip, is edible arrangements)