pepper: be expensive in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tomato sauce
Weight: 0.65
, spice
Weight: 0.63
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.62
, vegetable
Weight: 0.60
, crop
Weight: 0.59
Siblings capsicum
Weight: 0.52
, black pepper
Weight: 0.39
, cumin
Weight: 0.36
, coriander
Weight: 0.36
, allspice
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in australia 1.00
be expensive in zealand 0.86
be expensive in new zealand 0.84
be expensive in america 0.84
be in sydney expensive 0.83
were expensive in europe 0.82
be expensive in japan 0.81
is uk 0.81
be important to india 0.80
uk 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(spice, be important to india)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pepper, be expensive in australia)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pepper, be expensive in australia)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pepper, be expensive in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(spice, be important to india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(spice, be important to india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(capsicum, be expensive in australia)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(capsicum, be expensive in zealand)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(capsicum, be expensive in new zealand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(spice, be important to india)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pepper, be expensive in australia)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pepper, be expensive in australia)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pepper, be expensive in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(capsicum, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(capsicum, be expensive in australia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(capsicum, be expensive in zealand)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(capsicum, be expensive in zealand)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(capsicum, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(capsicum, be expensive in new zealand)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(pepper, be expensive in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pepper, be expensive in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spice, be important to india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(capsicum, be expensive in australia)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(capsicum, be expensive in zealand)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(capsicum, be expensive in new zealand)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(pepper, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spice, be important to india)