pepsi: be in trouble

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.65
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.61
Siblings soda pop
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.35
, starbucks
Weight: 0.35
, toyota
Weight: 0.35
, cola
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in trouble 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be in trouble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be in trouble)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pepsi, be in trouble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(starbucks, be in trouble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be in trouble)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pepsi, be in trouble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(pepsi, be in trouble)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pepsi, be in trouble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pepsi, be in trouble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be in trouble)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pepsi, be in trouble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pepsi, be in trouble)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be in trouble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(starbucks, be in trouble)