pepsi: be less popular than coke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.65
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.61
Siblings soda pop
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.35
, starbucks
Weight: 0.35
, toyota
Weight: 0.35
, cola
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less popular than coke 1.00
be more popular than coke 0.99
be better than coke 0.94
be cheaper than coke 0.94
be much better than coke 0.94
be bigger than coke 0.93
be healthier than coke 0.90
go faster coke 0.89
go coke 0.88
go faster then coke 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pepsi, be less popular than coke)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pepsi, be better than coke)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pepsi, be cheaper than coke)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pepsi, be healthier than coke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be cheaper than coke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(pepsi, be cheaper than coke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pepsi, be bigger than coke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pepsi, be more popular than coke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pepsi, be much better than coke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be healthier than coke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be better than coke)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be bigger than coke)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(pepsi, be healthier than coke)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(pepsi, be bigger than coke)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be more popular than coke)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be more popular than coke)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be cheaper than coke)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pepsi, be better than coke)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(pepsi, be more popular than coke)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be much better than coke)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be bigger than coke)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be healthier than coke)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pepsi, be much better than coke)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be better than coke)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be much better than coke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be less popular than coke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(pepsi, be less popular than coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pepsi, be less popular than coke)