pepsi: be under fire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.65
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.61
Siblings soda pop
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.35
, starbucks
Weight: 0.35
, toyota
Weight: 0.35
, cola
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under fire 1.00
has state fire 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pepsi, be under fire)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(pepsi, be under fire)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pepsi, be under fire)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pepsi, has state fire)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(pepsi, be under fire)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(pepsi, has state fire)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(pepsi, be under fire)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, has state fire)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(pepsi, be under fire)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pepsi, has state fire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(pepsi, be under fire)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pepsi, be under fire)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be under fire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pepsi, be under fire)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pepsi, be under fire)