perch: has physical part teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.70
, species
Weight: 0.54
, bait
Weight: 0.44
, fresh water
Weight: 0.42
, object
Weight: 0.42
Siblings tree branch
Weight: 0.64
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.37
, walleye
Weight: 0.36
, smallmouth bass
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part teeth 1.00
has physical part operculum 0.86
has physical part nostrils 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(perch, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(perch, has physical part teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(perch, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(perch, has physical part operculum)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(perch, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(perch, has physical part nostrils)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(perch, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(perch, has physical part nostrils)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(perch, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(perch, has physical part nostrils)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(perch, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(perch, has physical part operculum)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(perch, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(perch, has physical part operculum)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(perch, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(perch, has physical part nostrils)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(perch, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(perch, has physical part operculum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(perch, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(perch, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(perch, has physical part teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(perch, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(perch, has physical part teeth)