performance: be bad

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.66
, record
Weight: 0.65
, discipline
Weight: 0.64
, success
Weight: 0.64
, display
Weight: 0.63
Siblings overall
Weight: 0.56
, achievement
Weight: 0.34
, accuracy
Weight: 0.33
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.33
, ability
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad 1.00
be good bad or mediocre 0.89
be at do what you be good at 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(success, be at do what you be good at) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(performance, be bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(success, be at do what you be good at)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(success, be at do what you be good at)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(success, be at do what you be good at) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(performance, be bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(performance, be bad)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(performance, be good bad or mediocre)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(performance, be good bad or mediocre)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(performance, be good bad or mediocre)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(performance, be good bad or mediocre)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(performance, be bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(performance, be bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(success, be at do what you be good at)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(performance, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(success, be at do what you be good at)