performance: be calculated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.66
, record
Weight: 0.65
, discipline
Weight: 0.64
, success
Weight: 0.64
, display
Weight: 0.63
Siblings recording
Weight: 0.64
, achievement
Weight: 0.34
, accuracy
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be calculated 1.00
affect calculated values 0.86
be calculated regards to ranks 0.81
be measured 0.79
is measured 0.79
be measured by money 0.78
be dominant in calculation 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(success, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(performance, be calculated)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(quality, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(performance, be calculated)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(quality, is measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(performance, be calculated)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(success, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(performance, be calculated)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(success, be measured by money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(performance, be calculated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(success, be calculated)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(success, be measured)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(success, be measured by money)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(quality, is measured)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(quality, be measured)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured by money)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(quality, is measured)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(quality, be measured)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(success, be calculated)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be dominant in calculation)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, affect calculated values)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be measured)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(achievement, be measured)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be calculated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(success, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(performance, be calculated)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(quality, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(performance, be calculated)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(quality, is measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(performance, be calculated)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(success, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(performance, be calculated)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(success, be measured by money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(performance, be calculated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(accuracy, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be calculated)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(accuracy, affect calculated values) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(accuracy, affect calculated values)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(accuracy, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be measured)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(achievement, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(achievement, be measured)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(accuracy, be dominant in calculation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be dominant in calculation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(performance, be calculated)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated regards to ranks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(performance, is measured)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(performance, be measured)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(performance, is measured)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(performance, is measured)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(performance, be measured)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(performance, be measured)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(performance, is measured)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(performance, be calculated regards to ranks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(performance, be calculated regards to ranks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be calculated regards to ranks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(performance, be calculated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(success, be calculated)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(success, be measured)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(success, be measured by money)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(quality, is measured)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(quality, be measured)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(accuracy, be calculated)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(accuracy, be measured)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(achievement, be measured)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(accuracy, affect calculated values)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(accuracy, be dominant in calculation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(success, be calculated)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(success, be measured)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(success, be measured by money)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(quality, is measured)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(performance, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(quality, be measured)