performance: be used to show talent

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.66
, record
Weight: 0.65
, discipline
Weight: 0.64
, success
Weight: 0.64
, display
Weight: 0.63
Siblings overall
Weight: 0.56
, achievement
Weight: 0.34
, accuracy
Weight: 0.33
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.33
, ability
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to show talent 1.00
be used to show your talent 0.98
be at show 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(performance, be used to show talent)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(performance, be used to show your talent)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(performance, be used to show your talent)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(performance, be used to show your talent)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(performance, be used to show your talent)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(performance, be at show)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(performance, be at show)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(performance, be at show)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(performance, be at show)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(performance, be at show)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(performance, be at show)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(performance, be at show)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(performance, be at show)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(performance, be used to show talent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(performance, be used to show talent)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(performance, be used to show talent)