performer: wear fishnets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents star
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.59
, songwriter
Weight: 0.56
, figure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings singer
Weight: 0.68
, musician
Weight: 0.64
, actor
Weight: 0.64
, tom jones
Weight: 0.61
, mentor
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear fishnets 1.00
wear fishnet tights 0.88
wear tights 0.85
wear stockings 0.82
wear black 0.78
wear sunglasses 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(artist, wear black)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(performer, wear fishnets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(artist, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(artist, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(musician, wear sunglasses)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(musician, wear black)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, wear black)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(artist, wear black)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(performer, wear fishnets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(actor, wear black)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(actor, wear black)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(musician, wear black)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(musician, wear black)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(musician, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(musician, wear sunglasses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(performer, wear fishnets)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear stockings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(performer, wear stockings)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(performer, wear stockings)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(performer, wear stockings)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear fishnet tights)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(performer, wear tights)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(performer, wear fishnet tights)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear tights)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(performer, wear sunglasses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(performer, wear black)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(performer, wear tights)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear sunglasses)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(performer, wear fishnet tights)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(performer, wear sunglasses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear black)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(performer, wear tights)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(performer, wear black)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(performer, wear fishnet tights)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(performer, wear sunglasses)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(performer, wear black)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(performer, wear fishnets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(artist, wear black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(actor, wear black)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(musician, wear black)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(musician, wear sunglasses)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(performer, wear fishnets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(artist, wear black)