perfume: be cheaper at target

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.68
, smell
Weight: 0.67
, liquid
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.62
Siblings lavender
Weight: 0.66
, deodorant
Weight: 0.63
, nard
Weight: 0.35
, sulfuric acid
Weight: 0.35
, hair spray
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper at target 1.00
be cheaper at perfumania 0.88
be cheaper at walmart 0.78
be cheaper in australia 0.76
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(perfume, be cheaper at target)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(lavender, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(perfume, be cheaper at target)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(lavender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lavender, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(deodorant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(deodorant, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(perfume, be cheaper at target)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(perfume, be cheaper at perfumania)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at perfumania)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(perfume, be cheaper at perfumania)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(perfume, be cheaper at walmart)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(perfume, be cheaper at walmart)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at walmart)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(perfume, be cheaper at walmart)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(perfume, be cheaper at perfumania)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper in australia)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(perfume, be cheaper in australia)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(perfume, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(perfume, be cheaper in australia)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(perfume, be cheaper in australia)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(perfume, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(perfume, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(perfume, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at target)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(perfume, be cheaper at target)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lavender, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(deodorant, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(perfume, be cheaper at target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)