person: be at apartment

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents elderly person
Weight: 0.80
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.82
, dead person
Weight: 0.78
, young person
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at apartment 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(person, be at apartment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(young person, be at apartment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(person, be at apartment)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(young person, be at apartment)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(young person, be at apartment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(person, be at apartment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(person, be at apartment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(person, be at apartment)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(person, be at apartment)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(person, be at apartment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(person, be at apartment)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(person, be at apartment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(person, be at apartment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(young person, be at apartment)