perth: be covered in smoke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.54
, town
Weight: 0.51
, country
Weight: 0.48
Siblings sydney
Weight: 0.35
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34
, adelaide
Weight: 0.34
, auckland
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered in smoke 1.00
be covered today 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be covered in smoke)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be covered in smoke)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(adelaide, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(adelaide, be covered in smoke)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(sydney, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(sydney, be covered in smoke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(perth, be covered in smoke)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(perth, be covered today)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(perth, be covered today)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(perth, be covered today)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(perth, be covered today)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(perth, be covered in smoke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(perth, be covered in smoke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(adelaide, be covered in smoke)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sydney, be covered in smoke)