:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(country, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(perth, is hot)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(country, is hot)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(country, is hot)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, is hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sydney, is hot)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(country, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(perth, is hot)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sydney, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sydney, is hot)
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(perth, is hot)
Similarity expansion
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(perth, is cold now)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(perth, is cold now)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(perth, is cold now)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(perth, is cold now)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(perth, is hot)
Typical implies Plausible
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(perth, is hot)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country, is hot)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(brisbane, is hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sydney, is hot)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(perth, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country, is hot)