perth: was established

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.54
, town
Weight: 0.51
, country
Weight: 0.48
Siblings sydney
Weight: 0.35
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34
, adelaide
Weight: 0.34
, auckland
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was established 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(perth, was established)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, was established)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(perth, was established)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, was established)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(perth, was established)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(brisbane, was established)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(brisbane, was established)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(perth, was established)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(adelaide, was established)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(adelaide, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(perth, was established)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(perth, was established)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(perth, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(perth, was established)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(perth, was established)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(perth, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(perth, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(perth, was established)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(adelaide, was established)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(perth, was established)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(brisbane, was established)