pet food: be much cheaper than food for humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.88
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
, product
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.64
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.87
, fast food
Weight: 0.41
, fresh food
Weight: 0.41
, junk food
Weight: 0.41
, canned food
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much cheaper than food for humans 1.00
be much cheaper than food 0.96
is expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dog food, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fresh food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(dog food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(dog food, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(junk food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(pet food, be much cheaper than food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pet food, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pet food, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pet food, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fresh food, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dog food, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)