pet: be called pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
, friend
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings hamster
Weight: 0.74
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.71
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, snake
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called pets 1.00
like animals is pets 0.95
is cats 0.89
is dogs 0.87
be than cats 0.87
be married on pets 0.86
being pet 0.86
be pet park 0.85
be like dogs 0.85
love pet 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pet, be called pets)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pet, like animals is pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pet, is cats)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(pet, like animals is pets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pet, be than cats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, is dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pet, be pet park)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(pet, is cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(pet, be than cats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pet, is dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(pet, like animals is pets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pet, like animals is pets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pet, be than cats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pet, is cats)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pet, is dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pet, is dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pet, be pet park)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pet, be than cats)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pet, is cats)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pet, be pet park)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pet, be pet park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, be called pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(pet, be called pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)