:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pet, is cats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, is dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pet, be called pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(pet, is cats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(pet, be called pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pet, is dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pet, be called pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pet, is cats)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pet, be called pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pet, is dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pet, be called pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pet, is dogs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(pet, be called pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pet, is cats)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)