pet: be important to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
, friend
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings hamster
Weight: 0.74
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.71
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, snake
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to humans 1.00
be beneficial to humans 0.92
help humans 0.91
attack humans 0.84
be important to society 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(snake, attack humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(snake, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(snake, attack humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pet, be important to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(pet, help humans)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(pet, be beneficial to humans)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pet, help humans)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pet, help humans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(pet, attack humans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pet, be beneficial to humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pet, attack humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pet, be beneficial to humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(pet, attack humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pet, help humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(pet, be beneficial to humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pet, attack humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pet, be important to society)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pet, be important to society)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pet, be important to society)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pet, be important to society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pet, be important to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pet, be important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pet, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(snake, attack humans)