pet: is dog

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
, friend
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings hamster
Weight: 0.74
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.71
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, snake
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dog 1.00
is dogs 0.94
be like dogs 0.91
dogs in particular 0.85
be pet park 0.85
being pet 0.84
love pet 0.84
is cats 0.84
like animals is pets 0.84
be called pets 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pet, is dog)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, is dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pet, is cats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pet, be pet park)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pet, dogs in particular)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pet, like animals is pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pet, is dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(pet, is cats)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(pet, like animals is pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(pet, be called pets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pet, is dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pet, is dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pet, is cats)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(pet, like animals is pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pet, be called pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pet, be called pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pet, like animals is pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pet, dogs in particular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pet, be pet park)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pet, dogs in particular)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pet, dogs in particular)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pet, is cats)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pet, be pet park)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pet, be pet park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, is dog)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pet, is dog)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)