pet: like animals is pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
, friend
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings hamster
Weight: 0.74
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.71
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, snake
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
like animals is pets 1.00
be called pets 0.95
is cats 0.91
be than cats 0.89
be like dogs 0.89
is dogs 0.89
love pet 0.86
like animals is particularly mammals 0.86
bring animals 0.86
being pet 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pet, like animals is pets)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pet, is cats)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pet, be than cats)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, is dogs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(pet, be called pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(pet, is cats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(pet, be than cats)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pet, is dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pet, be called pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pet, be than cats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pet, be called pets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pet, is cats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pet, is dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pet, is dogs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pet, be than cats)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pet, is cats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pet, like animals is pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(pet, like animals is pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pet, like animals is pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)