petrol: be less efficient than diesel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fuel
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.55
, commodity
Weight: 0.53
, issue
Weight: 0.52
, liquid
Weight: 0.51
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.40
, gasoline
Weight: 0.39
, diesel
Weight: 0.38
, gas
Weight: 0.37
, motor oil
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less efficient than diesel 1.00
be more expensive than diesel 0.95
be expensive than diesel 0.93
be better than diesel 0.93
be cheaper than diesel 0.93
be faster than diesel 0.93
be more dangerous than diesel 0.92
suddenly cost more than diesel 0.91
is efficient fuel 0.91
be more efficient than ethanol 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, be more expensive than diesel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, be cheaper than diesel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, be better than diesel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gasoline, be better than diesel)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gasoline, be better than diesel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(gasoline, be cheaper than diesel)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gasoline, be cheaper than diesel)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(gasoline, be more expensive than diesel)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gasoline, be more expensive than diesel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(petrol, be expensive than diesel)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(petrol, is efficient fuel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(petrol, be more expensive than diesel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(petrol, be better than diesel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more dangerous than diesel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(petrol, be more dangerous than diesel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(petrol, be cheaper than diesel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more expensive than diesel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(petrol, be faster than diesel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(petrol, be expensive than diesel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(petrol, be more expensive than diesel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(petrol, is efficient fuel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(petrol, be more dangerous than diesel)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(petrol, be more dangerous than diesel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be cheaper than diesel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(petrol, be cheaper than diesel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(petrol, be more expensive than diesel)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(petrol, be better than diesel)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(petrol, be expensive than diesel)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be expensive than diesel)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(petrol, is efficient fuel)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(petrol, be faster than diesel)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(petrol, be cheaper than diesel)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(petrol, is efficient fuel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be better than diesel)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be faster than diesel)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(petrol, be better than diesel)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(petrol, be faster than diesel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(gasoline, be better than diesel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gasoline, be more expensive than diesel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gasoline, be cheaper than diesel)