petrol: be more efficient than ethanol

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fuel
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.55
, commodity
Weight: 0.53
, issue
Weight: 0.52
, liquid
Weight: 0.51
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.40
, gasoline
Weight: 0.39
, diesel
Weight: 0.38
, gas
Weight: 0.37
, motor oil
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient than ethanol 1.00
be less efficient than diesel 0.89
is efficient fuel 0.87
be more convenient fuel than coal 0.84
be more expensive than diesel 0.83
be more expensive than other fuels 0.82
be cheaper than diesel 0.82
be better than diesel 0.82
be faster than diesel 0.81
be more dangerous than diesel 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, be more expensive than diesel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, be cheaper than diesel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, be better than diesel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gasoline, be better than diesel)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gasoline, be better than diesel)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(gasoline, be cheaper than diesel)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gasoline, be cheaper than diesel)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(gasoline, be more expensive than diesel)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gasoline, be more expensive than diesel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(petrol, is efficient fuel)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(petrol, be more expensive than other fuels)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(petrol, be more expensive than other fuels)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more expensive than other fuels)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(petrol, be more expensive than other fuels)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(petrol, be better than diesel)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(petrol, be more expensive than diesel)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(petrol, be more dangerous than diesel)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more dangerous than diesel)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(petrol, be cheaper than diesel)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(petrol, be faster than diesel)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more expensive than diesel)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(petrol, is efficient fuel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(petrol, be more dangerous than diesel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(petrol, be more dangerous than diesel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be cheaper than diesel)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(petrol, is efficient fuel)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(petrol, be more expensive than diesel)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(petrol, is efficient fuel)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(petrol, be more expensive than diesel)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(petrol, be cheaper than diesel)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(petrol, be better than diesel)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(petrol, be cheaper than diesel)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be better than diesel)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(petrol, be faster than diesel)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be faster than diesel)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(petrol, be better than diesel)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(petrol, be faster than diesel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gasoline, be more expensive than diesel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(gasoline, be better than diesel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gasoline, be cheaper than diesel)