petroleum: be considered non-renewable energy source

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.61
, industry
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.59
Siblings motor oil
Weight: 0.69
, propane
Weight: 0.62
, naphtha
Weight: 0.50
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.40
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered non-renewable energy source 1.00
be considered energy source 1.00
is energy source 0.96
be used as source of energy 0.95
is good energy source 0.94
be most important source of energy 0.94
is bad energy source 0.93
is popular energy source 0.93
be used as source 0.89
non renewable sources of energy 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(propane, is good energy source)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(propane, is good energy source)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(propane, is good energy source)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(petroleum, be used as source of energy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(petroleum, be used as source of energy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(petroleum, non renewable sources of energy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(petroleum, non renewable sources of energy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, non renewable sources of energy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(petroleum, non renewable sources of energy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(petroleum, be used as source of energy)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, be most important source of energy)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(petroleum, be most important source of energy)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(petroleum, be most important source of energy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, be used as source of energy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(petroleum, be most important source of energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, be considered non-renewable energy source)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(propane, is good energy source)