petroleum: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.61
, industry
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.59
Siblings motor oil
Weight: 0.69
, propane
Weight: 0.62
, naphtha
Weight: 0.50
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.40
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad for environment 0.80
has quality resources 0.76
has quality resource 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fuel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(propane, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(propane, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fuel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(propane, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(propane, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality resource)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(propane, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(propane, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(petroleum, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(petroleum, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(petroleum, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(petroleum, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality resource)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality resources)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(petroleum, has quality resource)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(petroleum, has quality resources)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(petroleum, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(petroleum, has quality resources)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(petroleum, has quality resource)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(petroleum, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality resources)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(propane, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(propane, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)