phagocytosis: be called cell eating

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, immune response
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.57
, mechanism
Weight: 0.52
Siblings apoptosis
Weight: 0.36
, macrophage
Weight: 0.35
, oxidative phosphorylation
Weight: 0.35
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.35
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called cell eating 1.00
be important to cell 0.86
help cell 0.85
be important for living cells 0.84
be in cells 0.83
be in prokayotic cells 0.83
be important in cells 0.82
be important for cells 0.81
be important to cells 0.81
be referred to to reticuloendothelial cells 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be called cell eating)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(function, be important in cells)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be important for living cells)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, help cell)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be in cells)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(macrophage, be referred to to reticuloendothelial cells)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be important to cells)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, be called cell eating)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(cellular respiration, help cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, help cell)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be in cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be in cells)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be important to cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be important to cells)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be important for living cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be important for living cells)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(macrophage, be referred to to reticuloendothelial cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(macrophage, be referred to to reticuloendothelial cells)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, be called cell eating)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be important to cell)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, be important to cell)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, be important to cell)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be important to cell)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be called cell eating)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(function, be important in cells)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, help cell)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be in cells)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be important for living cells)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be important to cells)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(macrophage, be referred to to reticuloendothelial cells)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(phagocytosis, be called cell eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(function, be important in cells)