phagocytosis: be example of active transport

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, immune response
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.57
, mechanism
Weight: 0.52
Siblings apoptosis
Weight: 0.36
, macrophage
Weight: 0.35
, oxidative phosphorylation
Weight: 0.35
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.35
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be example of active transport 1.00
is active transport 0.94
be example of transport 0.92
require active transport 0.90
is active 0.82
has state transport 0.81
require transport 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(process, require active transport)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(process, require transport)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(process, require transport)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(process, require active transport)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(process, require active transport)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(process, require transport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(process, require active transport)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(process, require transport)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state transport)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, is active transport)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, is active transport)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, is active transport)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of transport)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, be example of transport)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, has state transport)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has state transport)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of transport)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, is active transport)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be example of transport)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, is active)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, is active)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has state transport)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, is active)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, is active)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(process, require transport)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(process, require active transport)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(process, require transport)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(process, require active transport)