phagocytosis: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, immune response
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.57
, mechanism
Weight: 0.52
Siblings apoptosis
Weight: 0.36
, macrophage
Weight: 0.35
, oxidative phosphorylation
Weight: 0.35
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.35
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality change 0.86
has quality difference 0.80
affect water quality 0.79
improve performance 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(apoptosis, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(apoptosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(apoptosis, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(apoptosis, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)