pharmaceuticals: be expensive in states

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.48
, environment
Weight: 0.28
Siblings banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, chemicals
Weight: 0.31
, electronics
Weight: 0.31
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in states 1.00
be expensive in united states 0.88
is expensive 0.84
be expensive in us 0.80
be more expensive in us 0.80
be more expensive in europe 0.78
be expensive in europe 0.76
be expensive in america 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in europe)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in europe)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(semiconductor, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in europe)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in europe)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in europe)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in europe)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(semiconductor, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(semiconductor, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in united states)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in united states)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in united states)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(pharmaceuticals, be more expensive in us)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in united states)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pharmaceuticals, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be more expensive in us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be more expensive in us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be more expensive in us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in us)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in us)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pharmaceuticals, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in america)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in america)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in america)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in europe)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in europe)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in states)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(semiconductor, is expensive)