phil: is splitting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents player
Weight: 0.56
, artist
Weight: 0.55
, group
Weight: 0.53
, man
Weight: 0.52
, team
Weight: 0.51
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
is splitting 1.00
have up splitting 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(phil, is splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(phil, is splitting)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(phil, is splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(phil, have up splitting)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(phil, is splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(phil, have up splitting)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(phil, is splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(phil, have up splitting)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(phil, is splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phil, have up splitting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(phil, is splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(phil, is splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(phil, is splitting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(phil, is splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(phil, is splitting)