philosopher: defend principle of reason

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents poet
Weight: 0.69
, writer
Weight: 0.67
, man
Weight: 0.67
, figure
Weight: 0.65
, scholar
Weight: 0.64
Siblings karl marx
Weight: 0.72
, david hume
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend principle of reason 1.00
defend principle of sufficient reason 0.94
defend principle 0.94
argue about concept 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(philosopher, defend principle of reason)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(philosopher, defend principle of sufficient reason)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, defend principle)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(philosopher, defend principle)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(philosopher, defend principle)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(philosopher, defend principle of sufficient reason)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, defend principle of sufficient reason)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(philosopher, defend principle of sufficient reason)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, argue about concept)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(philosopher, defend principle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(philosopher, argue about concept)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(philosopher, argue about concept)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(philosopher, argue about concept)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, defend principle of reason)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(philosopher, defend principle of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(philosopher, defend principle of reason)