philosophy: be characterized as rational

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.67
, theme
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, program
Weight: 0.65
Siblings buddhism
Weight: 0.66
, libertarianism
Weight: 0.65
, experience
Weight: 0.64
, materialism
Weight: 0.64
, mathematics
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be characterized as rational 1.00
be defined 0.77
be defined thinking 0.76
describe nature 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be defined)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mathematics, be defined)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be defined)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(philosophy, be characterized as rational)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, describe nature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(philosophy, be defined)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(philosophy, be defined)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be defined)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be defined)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(philosophy, be defined)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(philosophy, be defined)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(philosophy, describe nature)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(philosophy, describe nature)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(philosophy, describe nature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be characterized as rational)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(philosophy, be characterized as rational)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be characterized as rational)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be defined)