philosophy: be considered parent science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.67
, theme
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, program
Weight: 0.65
Siblings buddhism
Weight: 0.66
, libertarianism
Weight: 0.65
, experience
Weight: 0.64
, materialism
Weight: 0.64
, mathematics
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered parent science 1.00
be regarded as parent discipline 0.84
language of science 0.77
be important to engineering science 0.77
is natural science 0.76
be considered language of physics 0.76
be regarded as mother of disciplins of study 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mathematics, language of science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(philosophy, be considered parent science)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(philosophy, be regarded as mother of disciplins of study)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be regarded as mother of disciplins of study)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(philosophy, be regarded as mother of disciplins of study)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be regarded as mother of disciplins of study)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered parent science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered parent science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, language of science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered parent science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)