philosophy: be considered universal science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.67
, theme
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, program
Weight: 0.65
Siblings buddhism
Weight: 0.66
, libertarianism
Weight: 0.65
, experience
Weight: 0.64
, materialism
Weight: 0.64
, mathematics
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered universal science 1.00
be considered science 0.88
be called science 0.85
be important in science 0.84
is science 0.84
be in science possible 0.82
be related to science 0.81
be different from science 0.81
be called science of sciences 0.80
be science of sciences 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(mathematics, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(philosophy, be considered universal science)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(philosophy, be considered science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(philosophy, be called science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(philosophy, is science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(philosophy, be called science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be called science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(philosophy, is science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(philosophy, is science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(philosophy, be different from science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(philosophy, be different from science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(philosophy, be important in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be different from science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(philosophy, be related to science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be important in science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(philosophy, be related to science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be called science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be different from science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered universal science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered universal science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in science)