philosophy: be defined as child of failure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.67
, theme
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, program
Weight: 0.65
Siblings buddhism
Weight: 0.66
, libertarianism
Weight: 0.65
, experience
Weight: 0.64
, materialism
Weight: 0.64
, mathematics
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be defined as child of failure 1.00
be regarded as child of failure 0.93
be defined as child 0.92
be defined 0.80
be regarded as mother of discipline 0.78
be regarded as mother of disciplins of study 0.76
be regarded as parent discipline 0.76
be defined thinking 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be defined)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mathematics, be defined)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be defined)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be regarded as child of failure)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be regarded as child of failure)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(philosophy, be regarded as child of failure)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(philosophy, be defined)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(philosophy, be defined)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(philosophy, be regarded as child of failure)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be regarded as mother of disciplins of study)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(philosophy, be regarded as mother of disciplins of study)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be defined)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be defined)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be regarded as mother of disciplins of study)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(philosophy, be defined as child)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(philosophy, be regarded as mother of disciplins of study)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as child)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be defined as child)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(philosophy, be defined)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(philosophy, be defined)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(philosophy, be defined as child)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as child of failure)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be defined)