phone: be at desk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.79
, cell phone
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, personal computer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.81
, phone book
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, modem
Weight: 0.61
, cellphone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at desk 1.00
be at office 0.78
be at drawer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(personal computer, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(phone, be at desk)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(phone, be at desk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be at desk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(personal computer, be at desk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be at desk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, be at desk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(phone book, be at drawer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(personal computer, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(phone, be at desk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(phone, be at desk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(phone book, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(phone book, be at drawer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(phone, be at desk)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(phone, be at office)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(phone, be at office)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(phone, be at office)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(phone, be at office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(phone, be at desk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(phone, be at desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(personal computer, be at desk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cell phone, be at desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(phone book, be at drawer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(personal computer, be at desk)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cell phone, be at desk)