phone: be dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.79
, cell phone
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, personal computer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.81
, phone book
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, thunderbolt
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous 1.00
be dangerous to humans 0.88
is scary 0.76
is possible hazard 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(phone, be dangerous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cell phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(phone, be dangerous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(phone, be dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be dangerous)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(phone, be dangerous)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cell phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(phone, be dangerous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(phone, be dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(phone, be dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(phone, be dangerous to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(phone, be dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(phone, be dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cell phone, be dangerous)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cell phone, be dangerous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)