phone: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.79
, cell phone
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, personal computer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.81
, phone book
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, thunderbolt
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
get expensive 0.94
is do expensive 0.93
is expensive nowadays 0.91
get more expensive 0.90
getting expensive 0.87
getting more expensive 0.85
is cheaper 0.85
is incredibly expensive 0.83
be more expensive than laptops nowadays 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cell phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(phone, is expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(phone, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(cell phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(headset, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(thunderbolt, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cell phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(phone, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(phone, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(thunderbolt, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(thunderbolt, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(blackberry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(blackberry, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(headset, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(headset, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(phone, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(phone, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cell phone, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(thunderbolt, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(headset, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(blackberry, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cell phone, is expensive)