phone: is helpful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.79
, cell phone
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, personal computer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.81
, phone book
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, thunderbolt
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
is helpful 1.00
were helpful 0.95
is useful 0.90
be useful 0.89
be helpful invention 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(phone, is helpful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(electronic device, is useful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(phone, is helpful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(phone, is helpful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(cell phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(phone, is helpful)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cell phone, be useful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(phone, is helpful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cell phone, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electronic device, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be helpful invention)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is useful)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is useful)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(electronic device, is useful)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(phone, is helpful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(phone, is helpful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(cell phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(phone, is helpful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cell phone, be useful)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(phone, is helpful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(phone, is helpful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(phone, is helpful)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(phone, were helpful)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(phone, were helpful)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(phone, were helpful)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(phone, is useful)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(phone, be useful)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(phone, is useful)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(phone, be useful)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(phone, is useful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(phone, be useful)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(phone, be helpful invention)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(phone, be helpful invention)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, were helpful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(phone, be helpful invention)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(phone, is useful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(phone, be useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(phone, be helpful invention)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phone, is helpful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(phone, is helpful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cell phone, be useful)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cell phone, is useful)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is useful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be helpful invention)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cell phone, is useful)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is useful)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cell phone, be useful)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(phone, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be helpful invention)