photograph: be at home

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.67
, portrait
Weight: 0.67
, evidence
Weight: 0.62
, image
Weight: 0.61
Siblings digital camera
Weight: 0.73
, shot
Weight: 0.59
, photo
Weight: 0.38
, artwork
Weight: 0.35
, poster
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at home 1.00
be at relative house 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(photo, be at relative house)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(photograph, be at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(photo, be at relative house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(photo, be at relative house)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(photograph, be at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(photograph, be at home)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(photograph, be at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(photograph, be at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be at home)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(photograph, be at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(photograph, be at home)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(photo, be at relative house)