photographer: be obsessed with youth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journalist
Weight: 0.64
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
, professional
Weight: 0.62
, visitor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings editor
Weight: 0.62
, edward weston
Weight: 0.62
, tripod
Weight: 0.59
, todd
Weight: 0.50
, reporter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be obsessed with youth 1.00
is young 0.79
young 0.78
obsessed with word 0.78
obsessed with word dynamic 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(todd, obsessed with word)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(todd, obsessed with word dynamic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(reporter, is young)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(reporter, young)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(todd, obsessed with word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(todd, obsessed with word)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(reporter, is young) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(reporter, is young)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(todd, obsessed with word dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(todd, obsessed with word dynamic)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(reporter, young) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(reporter, young)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(photographer, be obsessed with youth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photographer, be obsessed with youth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(photographer, be obsessed with youth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(todd, obsessed with word)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(todd, obsessed with word dynamic)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(reporter, young)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photographer, be obsessed with youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(reporter, is young)