photographer: delight in scenic beauty

Related concepts

Parents	journalist Weight: 0.64 , specialist Weight: 0.62 , professional Weight: 0.62 , visitor Weight: 0.61
Siblings	editor Weight: 0.62 , tripod Weight: 0.59 , todd Weight: 0.50 , tourist Weight: 0.49 , reporter Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
delight in scenic beauty	1.00
view scenery	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(photographer, delight in scenic beauty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(tourist, view scenery)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(photographer, delight in scenic beauty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(tourist, view scenery) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(tourist, view scenery)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(photographer, delight in scenic beauty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(photographer, delight in scenic beauty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(photographer, delight in scenic beauty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(photographer, delight in scenic beauty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(photographer, delight in scenic beauty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(photographer, delight in scenic beauty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(photographer, delight in scenic beauty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(photographer, delight in scenic beauty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(tourist, view scenery)