photographer: match names to photographs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journalist
Weight: 0.64
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
, professional
Weight: 0.62
, visitor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings editor
Weight: 0.62
, edward weston
Weight: 0.62
, tripod
Weight: 0.59
, todd
Weight: 0.50
, reporter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
match names to photographs 1.00
get photos 0.84
put on photos 0.83
choose photograph 0.83
take pictures 0.83
take photos 0.82
take many pictures 0.81
anglicize names 0.81
photograph art nudes 0.80
photograph fine art nudes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(reporter, anglicize names)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(reporter, anglicize names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(reporter, anglicize names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(photographer, match names to photographs)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(photographer, get photos)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(photographer, get photos)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(photographer, get photos)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(photographer, put on photos)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(photographer, choose photograph)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(photographer, take pictures)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(photographer, put on photos)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(photographer, take photos)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(photographer, choose photograph)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(photographer, take pictures)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(photographer, choose photograph)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(photographer, take photos)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(photographer, take pictures)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(photographer, put on photos)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(photographer, take photos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(photographer, put on photos)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(photographer, take pictures)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(photographer, take photos)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(photographer, choose photograph)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(photographer, get photos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(photographer, match names to photographs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photographer, match names to photographs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(photographer, match names to photographs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reporter, anglicize names)