photographer: put tape on cameras

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journalist
Weight: 0.64
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
, professional
Weight: 0.62
, visitor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings editor
Weight: 0.62
, edward weston
Weight: 0.62
, tripod
Weight: 0.59
, todd
Weight: 0.50
, reporter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
put tape on cameras 1.00
tape cameras 0.98
have cameras 0.89
use cameras 0.89
use dslr cameras 0.85
have multiple cameras 0.85
carry 2 cameras 0.85
move up and down camera 0.81
make camera reports 0.80
make hidden camera reports 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(journalist, make hidden camera reports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(photographer, put tape on cameras)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(journalist, make hidden camera reports)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(journalist, make hidden camera reports)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(journalist, make hidden camera reports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(photographer, put tape on cameras)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(photographer, put tape on cameras)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(photographer, have multiple cameras)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(photographer, move up and down camera)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(photographer, move up and down camera)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(photographer, use dslr cameras)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(photographer, have multiple cameras)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(photographer, use dslr cameras)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(photographer, use dslr cameras)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(photographer, move up and down camera)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(photographer, use dslr cameras)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(photographer, have multiple cameras)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(photographer, have multiple cameras)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(photographer, move up and down camera)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(photographer, put tape on cameras)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(photographer, put tape on cameras)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(journalist, make hidden camera reports)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(photographer, put tape on cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(journalist, make hidden camera reports)