photography: be better than colour

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, invention
Weight: 0.64
, passion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.35
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, needlework
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than colour 1.00
be better than video 0.88
be better than music 0.88
be better than sports 0.87
be better than science 0.86
is quicker 0.83
build better being 0.82
make world better place 0.81
be more important than science 0.80
build better human being 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(art, be better than music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(photography, be better than colour)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(art, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(photography, be better than colour)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(art, be better than sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(photography, be better than colour)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(art, be better than sports)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(art, be better than science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(art, be better than music)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(art, be better than sports)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(art, be better than science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(art, be better than music)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(painting, is quicker)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(art, be better than music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(photography, be better than colour)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(art, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(photography, be better than colour)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(art, be better than sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(photography, be better than colour)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(painting, is quicker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(painting, is quicker)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(photography, be better than colour)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(photography, be better than video)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(photography, be better than video)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(photography, be better than video)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(photography, be better than video)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be better than colour)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(photography, be better than colour)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(art, be better than sports)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(art, be better than science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(art, be better than music)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(painting, is quicker)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(art, be better than sports)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(art, be better than science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(photography, be better than colour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(art, be better than music)