photography: be evaluated as art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, invention
Weight: 0.64
, passion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.35
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, needlework
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be evaluated as art 1.00
be considered art 0.83
be used in art 0.80
be as art 0.80
be different to art 0.79
was considered important art form 0.78
be called art 0.78
be differ from applied art 0.78
be different to other art 0.78
be important in art 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(medium, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(photography, be evaluated as art)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(art, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(photography, be evaluated as art)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(art, be called art)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(photography, be evaluated as art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(art, be considered art)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(art, be called art)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(medium, be important in art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(medium, be important in art)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(art, be considered art)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(art, be called art)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, be considered art)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, be important in art)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, be used in art)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(painting, be as art)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(medium, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(art, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(art, be called art)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(calligraphy, be used in art)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, be used in art)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(painting, be as art)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(painting, be as art)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calligraphy, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, be considered art)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(calligraphy, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, be important in art)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(photography, be evaluated as art)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(photography, be considered art)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(photography, be called art)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(photography, be considered art)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photography, be important in art)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(photography, be considered art)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(photography, be called art)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(photography, be called art)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, be important in art)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(photography, be considered art)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(photography, be important in art)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(photography, be important in art)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(photography, be called art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(photography, be evaluated as art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(art, be considered art)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(art, be called art)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(medium, be important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(calligraphy, be used in art)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(painting, be as art)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(calligraphy, be considered art)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(calligraphy, be important in art)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(art, be considered art)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(art, be called art)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(photography, be evaluated as art)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(medium, be important in art)