photography: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, invention
Weight: 0.64
, passion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.35
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, needlework
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
be related to life 0.89
be related to world 0.88
be related to government 0.85
be related to technology 0.83
be related in art 0.81
be related to religion 0.79
be related to economy 0.79
be linked 0.78
be related to politics 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(art, be related)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(photography, be related)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(art, be related to world)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(photography, be related)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(medium, be related in art)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(photography, be related)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(art, be related to religion)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(photography, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(art, be related)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(art, be related to world)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(medium, be related in art)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(art, be related to religion)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(art, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(art, be related to world)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(medium, be related in art)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(art, be related to religion)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(art, be related)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, be related)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(art, be related to world)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, be related)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(medium, be related in art)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, be related)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(art, be related to religion)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(photography, be related)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(photography, be related to technology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(photography, be related to technology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(photography, be related to technology)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(photography, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(art, be related)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(art, be related to religion)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(art, be related to world)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(medium, be related in art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(art, be related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(art, be related to world)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(medium, be related in art)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(photography, be related)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(art, be related to religion)