photography: be related to math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, invention
Weight: 0.64
, passion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.35
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, needlework
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to math 1.00
be less important than math science 0.89
be based on maths 0.81
be related to physics 0.80
relate to science 0.79
relate to humanities 0.77
be related to geometry 0.77
be more important than science 0.76
is science 0.76
be related 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(art, be related)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(photography, be related to math)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(invention, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(photography, be related to math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(invention, relate to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(art, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(invention, relate to science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(art, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(art, be related)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(photography, be related to math)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(invention, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(photography, be related to math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(photography, be related to math)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(photography, be based on maths)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(photography, be based on maths)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(photography, be based on maths)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(photography, be based on maths)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to physics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(photography, be related to physics)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(photography, is science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(photography, is science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(photography, be related to physics)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(photography, is science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(photography, be related to physics)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(photography, is science)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(photography, be related)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, be related)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(photography, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(photography, be related to math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(invention, relate to science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(art, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(invention, relate to science)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(photography, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(art, be related)